FREEDOM IN PRINT; Media. - pvt. All Protections of Law Reserved.
12/13/24
QUINT; and SUGAR WATER
At the essay related to the Indo-Aryan Linguistic Operation Analytics, need the thinkers and readers be first erudite and literate, both ? "Literate" would mean large experience of the condition, and conditions, of others. "Erudite" means smart at finishing the accurate meaning of facts; and, as a word it is probably derived from the Indo-Aryan Sanskrit "ru", "light". Except that the "e" is the micro-syllabic prefix; probably from "euro". You have seen it at the Top of the Eye Chart. I am speaking their language. I know a few really good people. They each individually help me to establish a good order of my own life and form. They allow me to have a "self" of true form.
Our object "sugar water" arises in the morning cup of coffee.
Having survived this far, we should ask the question, make the philosophy in action at intellect: that there is a danger that some who we have known made the "Proposition A" that 1) "There is not an existential original virtue in the form of a human.". 2) "We can, and must, reduce and destroy anyone; as per a raw necessity of a group condition and motive.". The person now remembered {actually, that raw, not-individuated reactor, parasite and sadist with group} who made and acted Proposition A {same together with others, a Group}' was betrothed in actions together with his own Racial-Polyandric Wife that Thiefted my own private property when I was a child. Their Motto, together: "When you are thrown to Isolation being a child, we can do nothing for you.".
The specific "maker" of the Proposition A, was a Police Captain who certainly quoted all the conventional words of Protection and security. So much for conventions.
As we observe the first word, "quint", and find its' meaning (Basic Definitions are most important to Linguistics; even though at this time, now, we have not rendered a definition of the word "Linguistic" itself. Some could opine; "It is simpler than you are expressing.". Even an "economy" is not a perfection and an ideal; as it is only a Convenience which is exacted by and Intent, for a purpose ? Who gets ripped off ?): As we observe the first word "quint", are we first, also, strictured to be "literate" ? To like Literature in all its' Common-Collective projected Skew ?
If the derivation of "quint" is, "Grab the Kid !, there are Cars and Traffic impacting !"; even we here need know where we are going to next, in the intellectual action made to determine Truth. We should, therefore, first assume that as we examine "Linguistic" we are also proceeding at "Philosophy".
There are Philosophies; and there are Philosophies. (Meaning that there are Philosophies and there are "other" Philosophies.) Therefore; there are Linguistics, and there are Linguistics.
Thus, we stand, bi-peds, looking to find the definition itself of "Linguistics"; or, if constricted by Life and Death, and Deadly, at Philosophy: to make a distinct Basic Definition of "Which Linguistics do we hereby define?".
Aristotle, famed to History as a "Philosopher", we can assume to be, by Name: an Aryan West Greek. So, Philosophy, Linguistics, and Etymology are inseparable: de facto. I do not add "de facto" to be here considered, as a spurious motive to cause each reader to entertain the next argument at dispute.
Stop. Observe. Examine. I will now Show a Card, expose its' obscured face; and set that aside Face Up, in full view; yet aside on the tabletop.
What else could "erudite" be at the other {to differentiate} than inclusive of all related and possible information, evidence ? Broad, technical, and accurate. "De facto" examined, is a necessity; and is not the possession of each Parasite "University of its' own Bribes Education structure and basis". You stand, therefore Stand Warned.
If the reader looks up to the Top of this page, an action of redundancy, "to make", becomes obvious someday in the context of present "capacity", that what does not exist on the Page today, exists as No Cookies = No Capacity = No Photo Image Available. That fact is now exposed as explicit, though devoid of Image.
Thus, it is my thinking desire to acquire a young Myna Bird, and to teach it to say prominently " Ock You ! Ock You, Boys ! ! ... ... Ock You ! ". The good and beautiful bird's may have known a priori that they are the creatures who know that sometimes will instantly fly, because they are the creatures whose created form is to fly in the air. No matter what the wind may cause to deflect the bough of a tree.
Of course, now I may change my mind. After all, when you either did stand a Horizontal Bar at a hard stone Architecture, or, do consider to construct to stand a Horizontal Bar: after all, that bar may fall. Philosophy is already existent; being the essence of Philosophy.
Therefore I can now by this activity, change my mind based upon the minimal knowledge that "Cookies, at the present programmatics are only a mechanical function which target and track a Source, Sources, and a movement, movements." {The specific Image needed.}. Shall I acquire the Image and place it here, Below; or, place it there, Above at "FREEDOM IN PRINT ... ... ; or place it there, and here, Both? 2 X, of the same Image ? "Life and Death", means that any collective impact, impact made by and of a collective, which "messes with" the mind process of the individual alone, motivated to cause that innocent individual to have a "distortion and impact, or Fragmentation, in or by the After-Image"; is Slow Deadly. At the life experience of the vast Cosmos; there does not exist an Infinitely extensive power of an evil. So. I now decide to place the same Image at 2 separate locations.
And now, I propose Image # 2: Always remember and respect our true friends in life.
The reader here of the motive at Philosophy may realize that I have also explicitly invited into the discussion additional good friends, who I have observed to distinctly Reject false Propositions; such as "Each good act shall not go unpunished.".
Perhaps, I mean; we can now start to find the meaning of "erudite", in the sense of "broad knowledge". Knowledge Follows Time. Time may be the Thief. If there is no Philosophy which renders accurate Proofs of Truth, admittedly, there may be no good Law and action.
The inquiry into the meaning of Philosophy, sadhana, does not necessarily espouse "a common" collective consciousness. In fact, any person; in the world that exists that presents the good, and the bad; may be politely accosted to be induced to accept from another a proposition, thus: " You appear to reject the forming of relationship or attachment with a specific family of Thieves. Each family is a family of Thieves. Therefore, you may as well, must even, make a relationship with us, our family (of Thieves)."
Therefore, now arises again the question about the individual innocent alone, and the Isolation of the individual innocent alone.
Determining real Proofs of Truth, then, is not to always to Pursue the Next Argument at Dispute. That predisposition, predilection, does not restrain itself from making "Proofs" of its' own assertion that the categorical definition, basic definition, of the meaning of "innocent" cannot be found, Proved. Real life presents the condition that each intelligent may sometimes say: "All others go argue.". Even so, the bad may take for itself even that, as a point of its' own use.
There also are Aristotelians; and then there are Aristotelians. The 2 may not agree. We here, have raised the high horizontal bar, span range, placed on the figurative pillars. Or, analogically, the Earth balance; > being a horizontal range, and contact between the Indo-Aryan Sadhana Vyatireka Nirukta Vidya Proofs of Truth {a sort of Linguistics}; and that contact with/between the Aristotelian. Again, Aristotle, by name and life location, is a Greek West Aryan.
I am educated at the specific, special, exposition and extrapolations made by Albert Upton {"Design for Thinking", and "Critical Analysis"} who was an Explicit Aristotelian; that is, dedicated. Even Upton knew, in his own thought mind, that something of Aristotle is a condition which he promoted, proposed.
A person, or authority, "May Know" in her/his own thought condition {conclusions}; for example, that "Aryan" and "Iran" are the same word meaning - "central Asia". That person usually "May Not Know" the Truth that Iran, Persia, is nowhere near to central Asia. Upton had his standpoint; and the basic substance works, at being informed and understanding Aristotle linguistic operation analysis, analytic operations. Yet, what conclusions about Aristotle and "Aristotelianism" made by anyone, are accurate ?? Ancient carvings in stone may be grand, yet, are meager. Having the developed resources to cut the hard stone was also meager.
[ Parenthetically, Aristotle was not a large Doll, making Glimmers of Liberalism to be Philosophy. He was ordered by the King of Greece to be the dutiful and "effective" teacher of Prince Alexander. In their own rudimentary life conditions of that time, "effective" could only mean; 1) teach the Prince about how to be the action of the Captain over the Warrior Killers of the Royal State. 2) Exercise strict duty in all teaching to finish the Princes' security control and advancement of all Metallurgy. 3) Exercise the same strict regimen re: all strategic things; including the acquisition of Chemistry Proofs, as per gunpowder, or anything of "power projection and impact". 4) Know and inculcate the critical security and respect related to Agricultural Security.
In all of that, including the Decisively Classified function of Agricultural Security studied in the context of Kung Fu Tzu being the Agricultural Security Accountant of that Royal State; and including the knowledge of the exigencies European/Mediterranean near and far Royal States power intrigues: would Aristotle be thought to have inculcated the belief in Liberalist Diversification at both action and Philosophy? Diversification at Metallurgy and Chemistry is one thing. Diversification by "Total Liberal Inclusiveness in all inter-personal relations" would have been quite
another. Leave it to Socrates to acquire certain fictional authority; and let the collective conscioners stare at Plato for quest over The Great Unknown.
Possibly, the famous Marco Paolo years later, did never journey to China, and only resided for times at Sicily or Cypress; by top secret "Universalist" Bribes, acquiring information and manuscripts for the State and States of his own Tributary duty. Some Philosophy conforms to the Aphorism, "Life is short; yet Music is long."; and some does not. So much for "Socratic Aristotelianism". Defining, considering, Aristotle to be philosophically related to Socrates is Falsified History.
And, fair King youth Alexander is said to have survived only that few years, during which the life year of his demise was only when I started to seriously study the guitar.
I would call those times Developed Neolithic. What could anyone then know the meaning of the characters on Papyrus? Carving inscriptions into Hard Stone was the regimentary and regimented minimum. Therefore, I have selected the Brass, to coin the definition: "Registration Precedes Regulation.". The accurate Basic Definition is the only proved quintessential. The Classification Tree is Decisive, being Aristotelian. Poetic Authority has its' "niche and its' cachet", it excites, and it may be rendered to some meanings on a classification tree; where, singularly, there exists "Stand at Attention" to empower
the impact of action. Relationship, was spoken.
There existed Cause and Effect certainties when any Philosophers would erroneously stand in the center of the expression of another and assume original authority for the specific meaning of the expression. ]
Then, Upton made one statement of his own which was, in fact, "Void Referent" {though, apparently he did not realize that fact}; and that statement alleged that "politics" is a function in Linguistics at making meaning. Expression, is also a "polity" being a collective. Perhaps he had his own "Sub-ordinate Category" of characteristic significance. I respect Upton well enough, knowing him as the Professor, face to face in the lecture hall; I can reject some of his propositions; and I can know that the basic structure of Aristotle Philosophy and Linguistic operations works.
That specific "Void Referent" results to a Glitch, thus: "All power resides in the Democracy of state.". And then that power of making and enforcing meaning at "Linguistics made strictured as 'politics' "; touts "inclusiveness" and is simultaneously "anti-inclusive". Like the post-ancient Western Colonialist Lawyer being Forced Conversion-racial attack Law; who states his/her Rational of Virtue being Law, and Voids that rationale in one movement. "Habeus Species et Habeus Generis"; a Legalized, Falsified, perjurious statement. Factually: "I take this coin from you, and out it in my pocket; because you are in Fatigue under parasite sadism which, generally, we, I, can do nothing about, and cannot prevent, correct, or honestly restore any Philosophical Assets which have been Thiefted.
Aristotle was substantially intelligent. He did not propose that the only existential attitude must be that one person is a murderer, working under the order of another murderer.
Stating a "Void Referent" {a fiction that is out of relationship} is a Debtor, where a very limited "Sign" becomes invested with the larger authority of a "Symbol".
Again, the freedom to think is the best.
Some of the Religious Authorities might reject the definition of the Void Referent proposition; and yet there are numerous different Religious Authorities; some of whom/which are pretty much Buzz Brained. Linguistics is a razors edge, developed from prior to the time that the hardest sharpest edge was cutting stone, and a priori, the plow blade which cuts the hard earth conditions. Not to mention: Water. Some, {not all}, of the Forced Conversion-racial Religious Authorities would reject Uptons' "effectively operative politics in Linguistics" Propositions. And then, some of the Non-Forced Conversion-racial Religious Authorities and proponents would also reject the "politics" proposition as per Linguistics operative conclusions or effect.
Then, beyond, and outside of all of that, each intelligent individual innocent alone may sometimes reject both "total inclusiveness" and "total exclusiveness". Take the example question: Does any person, at times, practice family-racial self-segregation, no matter what the skin color? That puts us back at the starting point {unnecessarily}, as that starting point is: What substantiates Proofs of Truth ?
Knowing that, or how, a person in Isolation made a mistake at starting a fire ?
Proofs of Truth are needed. In fact, there is the real need sometimes to determine a Proof of Truth, as to which person is virtue, and which is actually evil.
The innocent individual alone; and Isolation. The child is "Isolation; and then Reach". That child was badly impacted by "Forced Isolation; and then Forced Acceptance". That is all of politics. Even in Linguistics.
What is heard, is derivative. "Derivative" possesses numerous disparate sub-categories. Etymology is derivative, being definitive and more than definitive.
No person should need to stray from accurate Aristotelian Proofs of Truth, to Socratic Politics {wearing a False cloth or garb touting Philosophy and Linguistics} of each Next Argument at Dispute, ad nauseum, ad fatigue. At the Indo-Aryan One-Asian Proofs; the forespoken false proposition is called "adhyaropa": = "false covering". "The Sheep is actually the Wolf."
Indo-Aryan Asian Linguistics has also been called "Dharma"; as masses of people during centuries have invested a plethora of meanings into 'accreted definitions' of that word "dharma". The earliest etymology {Nirukta} definition being at a root, of that word meaning is "dharm". The word "dharm" means "a thing". That obviously means "a thing identified". At words, "dharma" is not "dharm". We have identified the differentiation of the two. Dharma is a development of symbolism, which is symbolic meaning. To identify a thing {dharm} has not an invested symbolism, except for those who "possess the time to not need accuracy".
"If you need to get paid, something will possess your time, and that is politics. An 'Economy' is not an Ideal; it is only a Convenience established in imperfection for an imperfect purpose, and by an Intent. That is the requirement of your Job that you hope for.". I am not asserting that each should reject the discipline and duty of securing and finishing a job.
Your Linguistics Authority is placed at a Job and its' strictures; and the one, 6000 years ago, who made the hard sharp metal, to cut the hard stone; is always at a different place than you.
Is that stupidity? Or, is that parasite mechanics which, by cause and effect certainties, makes Losses? Or, is that both.
It may be evident that during cold dense air, the isolated fire coal will Burn Longer, unseen, than during warm air. Dense = more oxygen. Yet, Ash is an Insulator. Not dense, and warm, air, is up, out and away. Yet, that proposition may be not factual: not given to a power of a/the Proof of its' Truth.
Accurate Linguistics = Fault Rates of Inter-mediated Structure; or, leads to the conceptualization and development of it. All things of "physical making" are sorts of Parallel Control Action. To establish a Hypothesis, being 100% outside of, external to, the object/objects being rendered to examination, = "Flank Examination"; and therefore, = Parallel Control Action. There, at that, at that object observed, there is known a "reversion" to the First Principle: "No thing has meaning in Isolation.", there exists only "relationship" to other existent's, and that concept, "Relationship", may be called the meaning of the sign/symbol of meaning: =, Equals. An Equation, is a definition of Relationship. Even the word "is", from "state of being", means "=, = to". Devoid of Relationship, even "being" has no meaning, is "void state". Science in Philosophy, accepts the knowledge {decisive Proofed}, that the concept "void state" may be an intellectually primary existent; as "void state" means "not an existent" it is nevertheless a recognized "object existent of Use".
Socrates asserted that "virtue" is open to question being an interminable skepticism; and Socrates was executed to death.
The "BOND/BOND'S of FRATERNITY": What are the Proofs of Truth of its' "existent state", or its' "void state"?
"ACTION, or MEANS" ?:>
:> A condition has been identified that: 1) You are advised by the definition of Truth and Inference, in Vidya, that your "Second Proposition must be known to you as your First Proposition"; in so far as the Proofed Sub-ordinate {on the "Decisive Classification Tree"} category of Proofed Meaning, thus: " The Bond of Fraternity established first by you, will be the Bond which you have established with the defined Sadist Parasite Betrayer of your own existence, virtue, wholeness, Truth, security, and peace. ". It may have been Aristotle, the Teacher, who, de facto, taught:
" Young boy. You must learn many things,Truths, facts, cause and effect; some which make your mind not peaceful, and some which tend to real peace. You will not know what is a Thief, until, too late, your experience knows what and who is the Thief. ". Some who are "virtue" are known to exist. Thus; "pure" Philosophy, of accurate knowledge of meaning, and even Science {being the result of Philosophy}; is made by Proof, Action, or Means, and those 3 are differentiated. I can "wing it" here, as the beautiful and friendly real life bird, may "wing it" away from each Distortion in Motivation and Acts. Return to the silent sight, and return to the silent sight again. Known Sadist Parasite actors, do make motivated Fragmentation Impact, against the being of the virtue child and mature. {Yogas Citta-Vrtti Nirodhah}.
A second Bond of Fraternity established, is the real "Direct Means". A "means" is necessary, because a pedestal, or a lateral beam atop 2 pedestals, may be actually askew; and that condition, like knowledge itself, is strictured by reality that Knowledge Follows Time. Each must look askance at what is identified to be askew. And, in fact, any Collective of Persons in Motion, promotion or activity: makes Skew, against the individual existent virtue alone. Some Anti-Essentialists, then collectively asserted, and "collectively acted {euphemism}, that for their possession was the "Direct Action". The individuated virtue alone, next established the "Direct Means" as a hope for Fraternity. The Stone Architectural edifice is not made for a definition of and symbol of destruction, nor for a definition of impermanence. If that was done, it was an Indirect {pejorative} Means.
Thus, it is meaningful that Aristotle was, By Name, West Aryan Greek. The Indo-Aryan East, One Asia origination; by contrast; made and possessed an origination in Proofs of Truth: that "vikshepa" is actually multi-fold {differentiated, different} meanings. 1) Skattering. 2) Internal as the processes of the mind, attention, and definitive concentration. 3) An Externally Caused Action, made by Sadist Parasite {"Evil"} incarnates; made maliciously and malevolently by Intent to Fragment an individual virtue alone. Except, it is distinct that the so-called Buddhism, being a known Fiction; was a far Western, mute, hyper-imitation of Asian family-breeding-racial: as a "Universal Forced Conversion-racial-Religio Social Attachment.
"Quint", must mean a "prime first". "Adi" {Sanskrit-Hindi}, also means prime first, original. "Adidas", at Nirukta/Etymology, means, literally: "Prime/first 10". I assume that that derives experientially from the quintessential experience that "The young child may inaccurately run out to the Traffic, and you may really need 10 fingers to get a hold of the child for its' security.".
[It can be no surprise, then, that the established Athletic footwear brand Adidas, finished its' extreme sports Greco Slam Wrestling shoes, from Kangaroo Skin. That was, apparently, one step above Dog Skin.]
Each being virtue, at Philosophy, Means, and Action; need not have compunction to know the real, effective meaning of the statement: SheNeeds2: SheDeservedTheVoid. Correspondingly, at meaning, the Buddhist Fiction makes a Symbol of "the Void", and makes a Symbol of "Impermanence". That is a fixed characteristic of Anti-Royalism. Aristotle was an aristocrat. You do not like that? Go to your own and argue, at your next and interminable, perpetual argument at dispute. It will have no actual "constant". An imitation constant = the Thief, who first "made" a Bond of Fraternity with the innocent unknowing.
The true and good Royal State {including that of the person and State of HRH Rana Siddartha Gautama of the Shakyamuni Raj Sarkar Royal State}: creates, makes, is "dedicated to", only Form; and it is not interested in Impermanence. At one side of the Slant, "impermanence" is identified to have "Characteristics" {Science}, yet at the other side of the Slant, "impermanence" is accurately identified to have "No Characteristics" {Philosophy}.
At Philosophy including its' Etymology, it is significant enough that the word "Shakyamuni" means a} "shakya" = "teacher", and b} "muni" = "form". Buddhism may have its' own figure of "The Void"; but it cannot possess the Proof of Truth of the actual History.
The malevolent force to cause the individual innocent, virtue, to a debilitating condition of Isolation, is the real question of importance. We would each be happy to sit at our table with our books, in security. To "invest" amplified, importance of meaning, is the definition of "Symbolism" and is even the definition of "A Symbol": even if that may be Fiction.
Thus, redundantly, a First Principle: Registration Precedes Regulation.
Knowledge Follows Time.
The accurate Basic Definitions of all Prime-ordinate, and Sub-ordinate, Identifiers of a Classification Tree, is the Prime of "Registration".
Each Algebraic expression, and its' operation, is a Classification Tree.
Because accurate Basic Definitions of each thing are essential: the Classification Tree is "Decisive".
Comments
Post a Comment